"Darn it, I wanted to use th..."

Darn it, I wanted to use this term to distinguish "not-explictly-consequentialistically optimizing for $Y$ still optimizes for $X$ when $X$ is being varied and is causally relevant to $Y$" from "having an explicit model of $X$ being relevant to $Y$ and therefore explicitly forming goals about $X$ and searching for strategies that affect $X.$" (E.g., natural selection does implicit consequentialism, humans do explicit consequentialism.) I'm not sure if I can think of an equally good replacement term for the thing I wanted to say. Would "proxy consequentialism" work for the thing you wanted to say?