"Request for comment: is the..."

https://arbital.com/p/498

by Patrick Stevens Jun 14 2016


Request for comment: is the definition of "cycle" something that should be on its own page? They're not about the symmetric group per se, but I've only heard of cycles being used in the context of symmetric groups.


Comments

Eric Bruylant

For core/definition pages I think we want to have super modular content (easier browsing, lets people pick just the parts they want to learn, reduces page scope creep), so putting it on its own page is good. It's a child of this page, which seems like the appropriate relationship.

Patrick Stevens

I took the plunge and put it on its own page.