(5) was intended to assume that or possibly if you want an easy way to prove (6). In that case, how does (8) not follow from (5)? (If in general, then and unless I'm missing something.)
by Nate Soares Jun 29 2016
(5) was intended to assume that or possibly if you want an easy way to prove (6). In that case, how does (8) not follow from (5)? (If in general, then and unless I'm missing something.)