Abelian group

https://arbital.com/p/abelian_group

by Nate Soares May 9 2016 updated Jul 18 2016

A group where the operation commutes. Named after Niels Henrik Abel.


[summary: An abelian group is a group where the operation is commutative. That is, an abelian group is a pair where is a set and is a binary operation obeying the four group axioms plus an axiom of commutativity:

  1. Closure: For all in , is defined and in . We abbreviate as .
  2. Associativity: for all in .
  3. Identity: There is an element such that for all in , .
  4. Inverses: For each in is an element in such that .
  5. Commutativity: For all in , .

Abelian groups are very "well-behaved" groups that are often easier to deal with than their non-commuting counterparts.]

An abelian group is a group where is commutative. In other words, the group operation satisfies the five axioms:

  1. Closure: For all in , is defined and in . We abbreviate as .
  2. Associativity: for all in .
  3. Identity: There is an element such that for all in , .
  4. Inverses: For each in is an element in such that .
  5. Commutativity: For all in , .

The first four are the standard group axioms; the fifth is what distinguishes abelian groups from groups.

Commutativity gives us license to re-arrange chains of elements in formulas about commutative groups. For example, if in a commutative group with elements , we have the claim , we can shuffle the elements to get and reduce this to the claim . This would be invalid for a nonabelian group, because doesn't necessarily equal in general.

Abelian groups are very well-behaved groups, and they are often much easier to deal with than their non-commutative counterparts. For example, every Subgroup of an abelian group is normal, and all finitely generated abelian groups are a [group_theory_direct_product direct product] of cyclic groups (the [structure_theorem_for_finitely_generated_abelian_groups structure theorem for finitely generated abelian groups]).


Comments

Qiaochu Yuan

I strongly recommend keeping to the standard term "abelian group," even though "commutative group" would be more systematic and sensible. The term "abelian group" is universal - I don't know a single mathematician, book, or paper that uses the term "commutative group" - and people comparing what they read here to what they read anywhere else are just going to be confused, and/or are going to confuse third parties when they ask questions.